Reading section 1

Translator: Montriou, W. A. (William Austin); Röer, Edward

Hindu Law and Judicature from the Dharma-Sastra of Yajnavalkya. Translated by Montriou, W. A. (William Austin); Röer, Edward. This historical English edition is listed by Project Gutenberg as public domain in the USA. Read the source text, search passages, and explore it with the reading assistant.

Contents
  1. Reading section 1
  2. Reading section 2
  3. Reading section 3
  4. Reading section 4
  5. Reading section 5
  6. Reading section 6
  7. Reading section 7
  8. Reading section 8
  9. Reading section 9
  10. Reading section 10
  11. Reading section 11
  12. Reading section 12
  13. Reading section 13
  14. Reading section 14
  15. Reading section 15
  16. Reading section 16
  17. Reading section 17
  18. Reading section 18

Produced by Sankar Viswanathan and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain material from the Google Print project.)

Permalink

Transcriber's note:

Permalink

1. The spelling, accents, and diacritical marks of Sanskrit words was not consistent through the book. These have been made consistent.

Permalink

2. The corrections noted in the Corrigenda on page v have been made in the text.

Permalink

HINDU LAW AND JUDICATURE

Permalink

FROM THE

Permalink

DHARMA-SASTRA

Permalink

of

Permalink

YAJNAVALKYA

Permalink

In English

Permalink

WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES AND INTRODUCTION

Permalink

BY

Permalink

EDWARD ROeER, ph. D., M. D.

Permalink

AND W. A. MONTRIOU, BARRISTER.

Permalink

Calcutta:

Permalink

R. C. LEPAGE & CO., BRITISH LIBRARY.

Permalink

London:

Permalink

R. C. LEPAGE & CO., 1, WHITEFRIAR'S STREET, FLEET STREET

Permalink

1859.

Permalink

* * * * *

Permalink

PREFACE.

Permalink

The immediate incentive to this undertaking was, a knowledge, or at least a strong impression, that a connected and explanatory translation of the rules of jurisprudence[1] in the Dharma Sastra of Yajnavalkya was a practical want.

Permalink

Such impression was coincided in, and therefore proved correct, by a long list of local subscribers eminently qualified, by position and experience, to decide.

Permalink

Dr. Roeer is responsible for the fidelity of the rendering, so far as depends on knowledge of the Sanscrit language and literature, of Hindu mythology and philosophy. Mr. Montriou has aided, so far as enabled by juridical acquirements and experience. The language of translation has, therefore, been a joint labour, often the result of much and anxious discussion, and, if not unfrequently but a choice of doubtful alternatives, yet, always a choice made with pains and circumspection.

Permalink

The text we have generally followed is Stenzler's[2] which is based on and selected from two MSS. in the royal library at Berlin and two editions published in Calcutta.[3]

Permalink

We have not neglected constant comparison with Stenzler's German translation as well as with the several detached passages as translated by Colebrooke and W. Macnaghten.

Permalink

Words within brackets ( [ ] ) are not in the original text.

Permalink

References to, and extracts from, the standard commentary upon Yajnavalkya, the Mitakshara, necessarily form the staple of our notes. All such extracts are distinguished by the initial (_M._), and the author of the commentary we invariably refer to as, the Commentator.

Permalink

At the same time, we have not blindly or implicitly followed this commentator. In some sense all Hindu glosses are untrustworthy guides. They assume the text to be the language of inspiration; and, as the several Dharma Sastras not merely differ, but often dispose of the same subject in a contradictory manner, Pandits deem it their duty to reconcile all discrepancies, how forced soever their interpretations may be. In passages so dealt with, we have endeavoured to give the plain meaning of the original text.

Permalink

We gratefully acknowledge the obliging assistance, in research, enquiry, and suggestion, occasionally afforded, in the progress of our task, by Babus, Chandra Saikhur Dev[4] and Shyamacharana Sircar.[5]

Permalink

E. R.

Permalink

W. A. M.

Permalink

August 1858.

Permalink

FOOTNOTES:

Permalink

[Footnote 1: _vyavahara._]

Permalink

[Footnote 2: Yajnavalkya's Gesetzbuch, Sanscrit and Deutsch, Berlin and London, 1849.]

Permalink

[Footnote 3: 1. Sanhita of Yajnavalkya, edited by Sri Bhavanicharana Vandyopadhyaya: 2. The text published in the Mitakshara Dharma Sastra, Calcutta, 1812.]

Permalink

[Footnote 4: Formerly head superintendent of the legal and zemindarry affairs of the maharajah of Burdwan.]

Permalink

[Footnote 5: Joint chief translator and interpreter H. M. Supreme Court.]

Permalink

CORRIGENDA.

Permalink

Page x, (Introd.) for "Swabhabha" read "Swabhava."

Permalink

" xi, " " "sl. 241" read "sl. 240."

Permalink

" 2, sl. 2, " "harken" read "hearken."

Permalink

" 79, sl. 303, " "equipage," read "vehicle."

Permalink

" " " " _gadee_" read "seat."

Permalink

Transcriber's Note: These corrections have been made in the text

Permalink

INTRODUCTION.

Permalink

Professor Stenzler enumerates[6] forty-six distinct Dharma Sastras or recognised codes of Hindu law and ritual, _scil._

Permalink

[3 cross symbols] 1. Agni.

Permalink

[1 cross symbol] 2. Angiras.

Permalink

[1 cross symbol] 3. Atri.

Permalink

[1 cross symbol] 4. Apastamba.

Permalink

[1 cross symbol] 5. Usanas.

Permalink

[2 cross symbols] 6. Rishyasringa.

Permalink

[2 cross symbols] 7. Kasyapa.

Permalink

[1 cross symbol] 8. Katyayana.

Permalink

[2 cross symbols] 9. Kuthumi.

Permalink

[2 cross symbols] 10. Gargya.

Permalink

[1 cross symbol] 11. Gautama.

Permalink

[3 cross symbols] 12. Chyavana.

Permalink

Open interactive reader

Public domain in the USA; copyright laws elsewhere may differ. AI interpretations are separate from the original historical text.