Reading section 14

Translator: Mitra, Viharilala

The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana, Volume 1. Translated by Mitra, Viharilala. This historical English edition is listed by Project Gutenberg as public domain in the USA. Read the source text, search passages, and explore it with the reading assistant.

Contents
  1. Reading section 1
  2. Reading section 2
  3. Reading section 3
  4. Reading section 4
  5. Reading section 5
  6. Reading section 6
  7. Reading section 7
  8. Reading section 8
  9. Reading section 9
  10. Reading section 10
  11. Reading section 11
  12. Reading section 12
  13. Reading section 13
  14. Reading section 14
  15. Reading section 15
  16. Reading section 16
  17. Reading section 17
  18. Reading section 18
  19. Reading section 19
  20. Reading section 20
  21. Reading section 21
  22. Reading section 22
  23. Reading section 23
  24. Reading section 24
  25. Reading section 25
  26. Reading section 26
  27. Reading section 27
  28. Reading section 28
  29. Reading section 29
  30. Reading section 30
  31. Reading section 31
  32. Reading section 32
  33. Reading section 33
  34. Reading section 34
  35. Reading section 35
  36. Reading section 36
  37. Reading section 37
  38. Reading section 38
  39. Reading section 39
  40. Reading section 40
  41. Reading section 41
  42. Reading section 42
  43. Reading section 43
  44. Reading section 44
  45. Reading section 45
  46. Reading section 46
  47. Reading section 47
  48. Reading section 48
  49. Reading section 49
  50. Reading section 50
  51. Reading section 51
  52. Reading section 52
  53. Reading section 53
  54. Reading section 54
  55. Reading section 55
  56. Reading section 56
  57. Reading section 57
  58. Reading section 58
  59. Reading section 59
  60. Reading section 60
  61. Reading section 61
  62. Reading section 62
  63. Reading section 63
  64. Reading section 64
  65. Reading section 65
  66. Reading section 66
  67. Reading section 67
  68. Reading section 68
  69. Reading section 69
  70. Reading section 70
  71. Reading section 71
  72. Reading section 72
  73. Reading section 73
  74. Reading section 74
  75. Reading section 75
  76. Reading section 76
  77. Reading section 77
  78. Reading section 78
  79. Reading section 79
  80. Reading section 80
  81. Reading section 81
  82. Reading section 82
  83. Reading section 83
  84. Reading section 84
  85. Reading section 85
  86. Reading section 86
  87. Reading section 87
  88. Reading section 88
  89. Reading section 89
  90. Reading section 90
  91. Reading section 91
  92. Reading section 92
  93. Reading section 93
  94. Reading section 94
  95. Reading section 95
  96. Reading section 96
  97. Reading section 97
  98. Reading section 98

[Sidenote: 7. Immutable & Imperishable ॐ अक्षरः ।]

Permalink

It is immutable, undecayable, imperishable, indestructible and immortal (अक्षरं). Thus in the Mándukya; ओमित्येतदक्षरमिदं बिकार रहितमित्यादि । The circle of O is considered the most perfect of all geometrical figures, as it was held by the Pythagoreans to be the best symbol to represent the perfections of the Supreme Being. It is the sign of divine immutability from the fact of every other figure changing its shape by its constant rotation round the centre and becoming a spheroid which is no more susceptible of change. Such is the changeable nature of all things until they become one with the Divinity.

Permalink

[Sidenote: Om Knowable. ज्ञेयं ।]

Permalink

_Om_ the symbol of God is said to be the knowable, because every part of its circumference is equidistant from the central observer. So is God said to be knowable (ज्ञेय) in Yoga philosophy for his knowableness to every one by means of meditation. Hence the Yoga system is called gnosticism contrary to the unknowableness of agnosticism.

Permalink

[Sidenote: 8. Eternity नित्यं ।]

Permalink

_Om_ is called eternal (नित्यं), because its circular form is the representation of eternity, having neither its beginning nor end (अनाद्यनन्तं): so it is the symbol of infinity, the circle being described by an infinite line. Thus Gaudapáda; अपूर्व्वोऽनन्तरोऽनन्तः नपरः प्रणबाब्यय । इति माण्डुक्य कारिकायां । १६ ।

Permalink

[Sidenote: 9. The First and Last.]

Permalink

Again Om is said to be the first and last of all things, because, says Táránátha, every thing proceeds from its centre as its source, and returns to that centre as its reservoir. तस्मान्निःसृताः सर्व्वेप्रलीयन्त तत्रबै । वाचस्पत्याभिधानं; or that every thing like the line of the circle meets at the same point from where it is drawn and stretched. Moreover Om as has been already said, is used both as the initial and final word of Mantras and prayers, so it is understood to be the beginning and end of all motions and utterances. In these senses it answers the _Alpha_ and _Omega_ of the Revelation, and the _initium_ and _finem_—_Hoal awl Hoal ákher_ of the Koran.

Permalink

[Sidenote: 10. The First, Last and Midst. आद्यन्त मध्यं ।]

Permalink

But _Om_ is declared again to be the first, last and midst of things, from its being uttered in the beginning, middle and end of prayers and recitals of sacred hymns according to the ordinance which says that, _Om_ is to be repeated thrice at every recital in the beginning, middle and end:—प्रशस्तं ब्राह्मणे नित्यं प्रणवत्रय संयुतं । मध्येच प्रणवं गुप्तंचाकारानुमं प्रिये । इति गायत्री तन्त्रं । This rule is said to bear reference to the triple state of the progression of mortal beings,—their evolution, sustentation and dissolution. यतोबाइमानि भूतानि जायन्ते येन जातानि । जीबन्ति यत् प्रयन्त्यभिसम्बिशन्ति तद्ब्र्ह्मेति ॥ The triple utterance of _Om_ has given rise to the triplicate invocation of Hari, आदाबन्तेच मध्येच हरिः सर्ब्बत्र गीयते, and with what Milton has expressed in his glorious hymn in the Paradise Lost.

Permalink

“Him first, Him last, Him midst, and without end.”

Permalink

The reverend Gaudapáda enjoins the same ordinance in his versified commentary or Káriká to the Mándukya Upanishad, where he says (verse 27):—सर्ब्बस्य प्रणबो ह्यादिर्मध्यमान्तस्तथैबच । एवं हि प्रणवं ज्ञात्वा ब्यश्नुते तदनन्तरं ।

Permalink

VIII. APPLICATION OF _Om_ IN THE VEDAS AND VEDANTA.

Permalink

[Sidenote: 1. Pranava = Adorable.]

Permalink

“O venerable, let me enter thee (viz. the word Om)—the sheath of Brahmá, swáhá. O venerable do thou enter me, swáhá. O venerable, I shall be purified by thee.” (Taittiríya Up. IV. 3).

Permalink

[Sidenote: 2. The Burden of song.]

Permalink

“Om, the hymns of the Sáma Sing, _Om_, Som, the hymns proclaim.”

Permalink

[Sidenote: 3. Commanding and assenting.]

Permalink

“By Om, the Adhwarju gives his reply:—By Om the Brahmá commands;—By Om he gives his orders for the burnt offering” (Ibid VIII. Anuvák).

Permalink

[Sidenote: 4. Beginning.]

Permalink

“_Om_, says the Bráhman, when he commences to read the Veda.” (Ibid).

Permalink

[Sidenote: 5. Om is Multinymous.]

Permalink

“Om is Brahman, it is immortal, it is light, it is truthful, and a portion of holy light.”

Permalink

“It is the sun, the truthful, the Yajur, devotion, fire, wind and air.”

Permalink

“It is the moon, strength, immortality, and the means of attaining Brahma” (Maitrí Upanishad VI. 35.) ॐ ब्रह्म अमृतं ज्योतिस्तेज सोहंश मात्रं । आदित्य मध्ये उदुत्वा मयूखे भबतः । ॐकारानुज्ञापणात् ॥ एतत् सवित् सत्यधर्म्म एतद्यजुरेतत्तयः एतदग्निरेतद्वायुरेतदापः । एतच्चन्द्रमा एतच्छुक्रमेतदमृतमेतद्ब्रह्म बिषयं ॥

Permalink

[Sidenote: 6. It is all significant.]

Permalink

But apart from all the particular objects to which this word is severally applied, _Om_ is found from its general sense of “a being” at large, to be significant of “all things,” as its archetype Brahman is made to stand for universal existence both collectively as well as singly (_in toto et per singulatim_), as it is said in the Mándukya Upanishad, ओमित्येतदक्षरमिदं सर्ब्बं तस्योपव्याख्यानं भूतं भविष्यदिति सर्ब्बमोङ्कार एव, यच्चान्यत् त्रिकालातीतं तदप्योङ्कार एव ॥

Permalink

[Sidenote: 7. Om includes all things.]

Permalink

“Om” says the Sruti, “is immortal.” Its explanation is “this all”; what was, what is, and what will be, all is verily the word “Om”; and every thing else which is beyond the three-fold time is also verily the word “Om.” For this all (represented by “Om”) is Brahma, and Brahma is “all.” (Mándukya Upanishad Bháshya verse 1 and 2). ओमिति ब्रह्मएबेदमोङ्कारः सर्ब्बमित्यादिश्रुतिभ्यः । अभिधानस्यचोङ्कारव्यतिरेकादोङ्कार एबेदं सर्ब्बं ।

Permalink

[Sidenote: 8. Scholium on the above.]

Permalink

According to Sankara’s explanation the rendering would be as follows:—“Om” this sound (or immortal) is this “All,” and its explanation is “what was, what is, and will be, all is verily the word “Om”.” (Sankara’s Bháshya of the above). Ánandagiri’s explanation is to the same purport; thus says he:—

Permalink

सर्ब्बास्पदत्वादोङ्कारस्य ब्रह्मणश्च तथात्वादेक लक्षणत्वादन्यत्वासिद्धेरोङ्कार प्रतिपत्ति ब्रह्म प्रतिपत्तिरेबेति ॥

Permalink

IX. THEOLOGY OF OM IN THE MONADS OF MONOTHEISTIC CREEDS.

Permalink

[Sidenote: 1. Monads or Unities. एकार्थकः ।]

Permalink

We have seen that _Om_ expresses all things (Sarvamonkára), by virtue of the word like its kindred Greek and Latin _on_ and _ens_ (B. _haon_), signifying “a being” by synecdoche (_laxaná_) of a part for the whole. And this is done of all things whether concrete or discrete and taken either singly or by groups of two or more things together; as it is said—“_Ekasadvisastrisas_” &c., _i. e._ _Singulatim_, _dualiter_, _pluraliter_ &c. We shall first come to see the monads expressed by _Om_ and leave it to the reader to discover the relation which the significates may bear to the symbol, or rest satisfied with the idea of their being meaningless or arbitrary.

Permalink

[Sidenote: 2. Om is speech or voice बाक् ।]

Permalink

Om, says the Sruti is Sarvávák “all voice and speech”; and we shall come to see below that it is applied alike to denote both human and brute speech, and words belonging to all the different parts of speech.

Permalink

[Sidenote: 3. Om is sound and word शब्द ।]

Permalink

“All things are united with words which express them, and all words are contained in the mystical syllable _Om_, (ओङ्कार शब्द म ।त्रं). _Om_, pervades all sounds; he rises above all objects which are expressed by sounds, who repeats this sound _Om_” (Ch’hándogya II.23.) (Maitrí p. 253).

Permalink

[Sidenote: 4. Om is Brahman ॐ शब्द ब्रह्म ।]

Permalink

“_Om_ is Brahman called sound (_sabda_). By means of _Om_ rising above all things, a man merges in the Supreme called Para Brahma.” “Om is the emblem of the Most High.” (Ch’hándogya p. 4. Manu II. 83. Bhágavad Gítá). So says the Maitrí Upanishad (VI. 22) शब्द ब्रह्मणि निष्णातः परं ब्रह्माधिगच्छति । ६ ।२२

Permalink

[Sidenote: 5. Om is Fire and its splendour ओमग्निश्च तेजश्च ।]

Permalink

“Om was splendour and fire at first. By this syllable _Om_ the splendour germinates, it shoots upward, it expands, and becomes the vehicle of divine worship. The splendour germinates in the form of the mystic syllable _Om_, as a seed germinates; _i. e._ It is manifested as the primeval form of the Veda, it next shoots upward as the internal sound _Om_ itself.” Maitrí Up. VII. 11. तेजो प्रथममोङ्कारात्मकमासीत् । तत्तेजोऽनेनैबोमित्येब तदुद्बुध्यति । मैत्री उप ७ ।११ । Fire was the first object of adoration of the Rigveda and of the fire worshippers of India and Persia. It is believed to be the _arche_ or beginning of all things according to Heraclitus.

Permalink

[Sidenote: 6. Om is light. ॐ ज्योतिः ।]

Permalink

“Om is light and manifest as light, the sleepless, deathless and sorrowless light.” Again; “_Om_ is light which shines in yonder sun, and in the moon, fire, and lightning” (Maitrí Upanishad VI. 25.). So says the Bhágavad Gítá, “That splendour which abiding in the sun illumines the whole world, which abides in the moon and in fire, that splendour know to be mine” (XV. 12.) Light was the first work of creation and the “first born” of Heaven. God said “_Lux fiat et lux fit_.”—“Let there be light and there was light.”

Permalink

दीप्यतोम् ज्योतिः । प्रकाशणाज्ज्योतिः । प्रणबाख्य प्रणेतारमरूपो बिगतनिद्रो बिजरो बिमृत्युर्बिशोको भबतीत्येबं ह्याह । मैत्री उप ६ ।२५ तथा । यदमुस्मिन्नादित्येऽथंसोमोऽग्नौ विद्युति बिभात्यथखल्वेनं दृष्ट्वा मृतत्वं गच्छतीत्याह । ६ ।२५ ।

Permalink

[Sidenote: 7. _Om_ is Lightening. बिद्युज्ज्योतिः ।]

Permalink

“The Veda is called lightening, since the moment when it is uttered (as Om), it enlightens every incorporated being; therefore by the syllable _Om_ let a man adore the infinite splendour of Brahman” (Maitrí Upanishad VII. 11.) यस्मादुच्चरितमात्र एब सर्ब्बं शरीरं बिद्योतयति । तस्मादोमित्यनेनैता उपासीतापरिमितं तेजः । मैत्री उप ७ ।११ ।

Permalink

[Sidenote: 8. Om is the Brahman light. ॐ ब्रह्म ज्योति ।]

Permalink

“The syllable _Om_ is the Brahman light or pure intelligence, veiled behind the fire and breath, and manifested itself at first as the one undivided sound _Om_.” Thus the Maitrí Upanishad Tíká (VII. 11). यस्मात् प्रणबात्मकमिदं ब्रह्मासीत् तस्मादोमित्यनेनैतत् ब्रह्म तेजो उपासीत् । मैत्री ७ ।११ ।

Permalink

[Sidenote: 9. _Om_ is Water. ओमापः ।]

Permalink

“Om shines in the waters” (Maitrí Upanishad VI. 35). आपो ज्योतिरसोऽमृतं ब्रह्मभूर्भुबःस्वरोम् । मैत्री ६ ।३५ । दीप्यतोमापः । ओङ्कारोऽनुज्ञापनादाप्यायनादापः । इति तट्टीका । Water is said to be the first work of God (आप एबमसजादौ ।) “and the Spirit of God floated on the surface of the waters” hence called नारायणः (Genesis and Manu). Thales found water to be the origin of all things.

Permalink

[Sidenote: 10. _Om_ is Flavour &c. रसोबैतत् ।]

Permalink

“Om is _Rasa_, moisture, flavour, taste, relish and love (Maitrí Up. VI. 35). The goodness of God is flavour, a man having attained flavour, becomes possessed of joy” (Taittiríya Up II. 7.)ॐ रसोबैतत् । रसः कर्म्म परिपाक निवृत्तत्वात् आदित्यस्य रसतं? सर्ब्ब कर्म्म फलाश्रय इत्यर्थः । By flavour _rasa_ they mean love also and love is believed to be the formative power according to Empedocles.

Permalink

[Sidenote: 11. Om is Ambrosia. ओममृतं मधु ।]

Permalink

“_Om_ is ambrosia the food of gods. (Gr. _He ambrosia est setos theon_). It is also honey and all sweet.” So the Sruti; अमृतं देबानामोदन हेतुत्वात् । मैत्री उप ६ ।३५ । असौबामधु । छान्दोग्यं तैत्तिरीयञ्च । १ ।७ ।

Permalink

[Sidenote: 12. Om Udgítha. ओमुद्गीथः ।]

Permalink

“_Om_, this letter the Udgítha, should be adored, Om is chaunted.” (Ch’hándogya I. 1).

Permalink

“The Udgítha of Sáma Veda, corresponds with the _pranava_ of the Rig Veda.” (Cowel’s Mait VI. 3).

Permalink

“The Udgítha is the principle part of the Sáma verse, and sung by Udgátri priests.”

Permalink

Open interactive reader

Public domain in the USA; copyright laws elsewhere may differ. AI interpretations are separate from the original historical text.