Reading section 112
Translator: Griffith, Ralph T. H. (Ralph Thomas Hotchkin)
The Ramayana. Translated by Griffith, Ralph T. H. (Ralph Thomas Hotchkin). This historical English edition is listed by Project Gutenberg as public domain in the USA. Read the source text, search passages, and explore it with the reading assistant.
Contents
- Reading section 1
- Reading section 2
- Reading section 3
- Reading section 4
- Reading section 5
- Reading section 6
- Reading section 7
- Reading section 8
- Reading section 9
- Reading section 10
- Reading section 11
- Reading section 12
- Reading section 13
- Reading section 14
- Reading section 15
- Reading section 16
- Reading section 17
- Reading section 18
- Reading section 19
- Reading section 20
- Reading section 21
- Reading section 22
- Reading section 23
- Reading section 24
- Reading section 25
- Reading section 26
- Reading section 27
- Reading section 28
- Reading section 29
- Reading section 30
- Reading section 31
- Reading section 32
- Reading section 33
- Reading section 34
- Reading section 35
- Reading section 36
- Reading section 37
- Reading section 38
- Reading section 39
- Reading section 40
- Reading section 41
- Reading section 42
- Reading section 43
- Reading section 44
- Reading section 45
- Reading section 46
- Reading section 47
- Reading section 48
- Reading section 49
- Reading section 50
- Reading section 51
- Reading section 52
- Reading section 53
- Reading section 54
- Reading section 55
- Reading section 56
- Reading section 57
- Reading section 58
- Reading section 59
- Reading section 60
- Reading section 61
- Reading section 62
- Reading section 63
- Reading section 64
- Reading section 65
- Reading section 66
- Reading section 67
- Reading section 68
- Reading section 69
- Reading section 70
- Reading section 71
- Reading section 72
- Reading section 73
- Reading section 74
- Reading section 75
- Reading section 76
- Reading section 77
- Reading section 78
- Reading section 79
- Reading section 80
- Reading section 81
- Reading section 82
- Reading section 83
- Reading section 84
- Reading section 85
- Reading section 86
- Reading section 87
- Reading section 88
- Reading section 89
- Reading section 90
- Reading section 91
- Reading section 92
- Reading section 93
- Reading section 94
- Reading section 95
- Reading section 96
- Reading section 97
- Reading section 98
- Reading section 99
- Reading section 100
- Reading section 101
- Reading section 102
- Reading section 103
- Reading section 104
- Reading section 105
- Reading section 106
- Reading section 107
- Reading section 108
- Reading section 109
- Reading section 110
- Reading section 111
- Reading section 112
- Reading section 113
- Reading section 114
- Reading section 115
- Reading section 116
- Reading section 117
- Reading section 118
782 A nymph of Paradise.
Permalink783 Hanu or Hanú means jaw. Hanumán or Hanúmán means properly one with a large jaw.
Permalink784 Vishṇu, the God of the Three Steps.
Permalink785 Náráyaṇ, “He who moved upon the waters,” is Vishnu. The allusion is to the famous three steps of that God.
Permalink786 The Milky Way.
Permalink787 This Book is called Sundar or the Beatiful. To a European taste it is the most intolerably tedious of the whole poem, abounding in repetition, overloaded description, and long and useless speeches which impede the action of the poem. Manifest interpolations of whole Cantos also occur. I have omitted none of the action of the Book, but have occasionally omitted long passages of common-place description, lamentation, and long stories which have been again and again repeated.
Permalink788 Brahmá the Self-Existent.
Permalink789 Maináka was the son of Himálaya and Mená or Menaká.
Permalink790 Thus Milton makes the hills of heaven self-moving at command:
Permalink“At his command the uprooted hills retired Each to his place, they heard his voice and went Obsequious”
Permalink791 The spirit of the mountain is separable from the mountain. Himalaya has also been represented as standing in human form on one of his own peaks.
Permalink792 Ságar or the Sea is said to have derived its name from Sagar. The story is fully told in Book I, Cantos XLII, XLIII, and XLIV.
Permalink793 Kritu is the first of the four ages of the world, the golden age, also called Satya.
Permalink_ 794 Parvata_ means a mountain and in the Vedas a cloud. Hence in later mythology the mountains have taken the place of the clouds as the objects of the attacks of Indra the Sun-God. The feathered king is Garuḍa.
Permalink795 “The children of Surasá were a thousand mighty many-headed serpents, traversing the sky.” WILSON’S _Vishṇu Puráṇa_, Vol. II. p. 73.
Permalink796 She means, says the Commentator, pursue thy journey if thou can.
Permalink797 If Milton’s spirits are allowed the power of infinite self-extension and compression the same must be conceded to Válmíki’s supernatural beings. Given the power as in Milton the result in Válmíki is perfectly consistent.
Permalink798 “Daksha is the son of Brahmá and one of the Prajápatis or divine progenitors. He had sixty daughters, twenty-seven of whom married to Kaśyapa produced, according to one of the Indian cosmogonies, all mundane beings. Does the epithet, Descendant of Daksha, given to Surasá, mean that she is one of those daughters? I think not. This epithet is perhaps an appellation common to all created beings as having sprung from Daksha.” GORRESSIO.
Permalink799 Sinhiká is the mother of Ráhu the dragon’s head or ascending node, the chief agent in eclipses.
Permalink800 According to De Gubernatis, the author of the very learned, ingenious, and interesting though too fanciful _Zoological Mythology_. Hanumán here represents the sun entering into and escaping from a cloud. The biblical Jonah, according to him, typifies the same phenomenon. Sá’dí, speaking of sunset, says _Yùnas andar-i-dihán-imáhi shud_: Jonas was within the fish’s mouth. See ADDITIONAL NOTES.
Permalink801 The Buchanania Latifolia.
Permalink802 The Bauhinia Variegata.
Permalink803 Through the power that Rávaṇ’s stern mortifications had won for him his trees bore flowers and fruit simultaneously.
Permalink804 Viśvakarmá is the architect of the Gods.
Permalink805 So in Paradise Lost Satan when he has stealthily entered the garden of Eden assumes the form of a cormorant.
Permalink806 Priests who fought only with the weapons of religion, the sacred grass used like the verbena of the Romans at sacred rites and the consecrated fire to consume the offering of ghee.
Permalink807 One of the Rákshas lords.
Permalink808 The brother Rávaṇ.
Permalink809 Indra’s elephant.
Permalink810 Rávaṇ’s palace appears to have occupied the whole extent of ground, and to have contained within its outer walls the mansions of all the great Rákshas chiefs. Rávaṇ’s own dwelling seems to have been situated within the enchanted chariot Pushpak: but the description is involved and confused, and it is difficult to say whether the chariot was inside the palace or the palace inside the chariot.
Permalink811 Pushpak from _pushpa_ a flower. The car has been mentioned before in Rávaṇ’s expedition to carry off Sítá, Book III, Canto XXXV.
Permalink812 Lakshmí is the wife of Vishṇu and the Goddess of Beauty and Felicity. She rose, like Aphrodite, from the foam of the sea. For an account of her birth and beauty, see Book I, Canto XLV.
Permalink813 Viśvakarmá is the architect of the Gods, the Hephaestos or Mulciber of the Indian heaven.
Permalink814 Rávaṇ in the resistless power which his long austerities had endowed him with, had conquered his brother Kuvera the God of Gold and taken from him his greatest treasure this enchanted car.
Permalink815 Like Milton’s heavenly car, “Itself instinct with spirit.”
Permalink816 Women, says Válmíki. But the Commentator says that automatic figures only are meant. Women would have seen Hanumán and given the alarm.
Permalink817 Rávaṇ had fought against Indra and the Gods, and his body was still scarred by the wounds inflicted by the tusks of Indra’s elephant and by the fiery bolts of the Thunderer.
Permalink818 The Vasus are a class of eight deities, originally personifications of natural phenomena.
Permalink819 The Maruts are the winds or Storm-Gods.
Permalink820 The Ádityas originally seven deities of the heavenly sphere of whom Varuṇa is the chief. The name Áditya was afterwards given to any God, specially to Súrya the Sun.
Permalink821 The Aśvins are the Heavenly Twins, the Castor and Pollux of the Hindus.
Permalink822 The poet forgets that Hanumán has reduced himself to the size of a cat.
Permalink823 Sítá “not of woman born,” was found by King Janak as he was turning up the ground in preparation for a sacrifice. See Book II, Canto CXVIII.
Permalink824 The six _Angas_ or subordinate branches of the Vedas are 1. _Sikshá_, the science of proper articulation and pronunciation: 2. _Chhandas_, metre: 3. _Vyákarana_, linguistic analysis or grammar: 4. _Nirukta_, explanation of difficult Vedic words: 5. _Jyotishṭom_, Astronomy, or rather the Vedic Calendar: 6. _Kalpa_, ceremonial.
Permalink825 There appears to be some confusion of time here. It was already morning when Hanumán entered the grove, and the torches would be needless.
Permalink826 Rávaṇ is one of those beings who can “climb them as they will,” and can of course assume the loveliest form to please human eyes as well as the terrific shape that suits the king of the Rákshases.
Permalink827 White and lovely as the Arant or nectar recovered from the depths of the Milky Sea when churned by the assembled Gods. See Book I, Canto XLV.
Permalink828 Rávaṇ in his magic car carrying off the most beautiful women reminds us of the magician in _Orlando Furioso_, possesor of the flying horse.
Permalink“Volando talor s’alza ne le stelle, E poi quasi talor la terra rade; E ne porta con lui tutte le belle Donne che trova per quelle contrade.”
Permalink829 Indian women twisted their long hair in a single braid as a sign of mourning for their absent husbands.
Permalink830 Janak, king of Míthilá, was Sítá’s father.
Permalink831 Hiraṇyakaśipu was a king of the Daityas celebrated for his blasphemous impieties. When his pious son Prahlada praised Vishṇu the Daitya tried to kill him, when the God appeared in the incarnation of the man-lion and tore the tyrant to pieces.
Permalink832 Do unto others as thou wouldst they should do unto thee, is a precept frequently occurring in the old Indian poems. This charity is to embrace not human beings only, but bird and beast as well: “He prayeth best who loveth best all things both great and small.”
Permalink833 It was the custom of Indian warriors to mark their arrows with their ciphers or names, and it seems to have been regarded as a point of honour to give an enemy the satisfaction of knowing who had shot at him. This passage however contains, if my memory serves me well, the first mention in the poem of this practice, and as arrows have been so frequently mentioned and described with almost every conceivable epithet, its occurrence here seems suspicious. No mention of, or allusion to writing has hitherto occurred in the poem.
Permalink834 This threat in the same words occurs in Book III, Canto LVI.
Permalink835 Rávaṇ carried off and kept in his palace not only earthly princesses but the daughters of Gods and Gandharvas.
Permalink836 The wife of Indra.
Permalink837 These four lines have occurred before. Book III, Canto LVI.
Permalink838 Prajápatis are the ten lords of created beings first created by Brahmá; somewhat like the Demiurgi of the Gnostics.
Permalink839 “This is the number of the Vedic divinities mentioned in the Rig-veda. In Ashṭaka I. Súkta XXXIV, the Rishi Hiraṇyastúpa invoking the Aśvins says: Á Násatyá tribhirekádaśairiha devebniryátam: ‘O Násatyas (Aśvins) come hither with the thrice eleven Gods.’ And in Súkta XLV, the Rishi Praskanva addressing his hymn to Agni (ignis, fire), thus invokes him: ‘Lord of the red steeds, propitiated by our prayers lead hither the thirty-three Gods.’ This number must certainly have been the actual number in the early days of the Vedic religion: although it appears probable enough that the thirty-three Vedic divinities could not then be found co-ordinated in so systematic a way as they were arranged more recently by the authors of the Upanishads. In the later ages of Bramanism the number went on increasing without measure by successive mythical and religious creations which peopled the Indian Olympus with abstract beings of every kind. But through lasting veneration of the word of the Veda the custom regained of giving the name of ‘the thirty-three Gods’ to the immense phalanx of the multiplied deities.” GORRESIO.
PermalinkPublic domain in the USA; copyright laws elsewhere may differ. AI interpretations are separate from the original historical text.